
A sponsor’s guide: choosing the best account bank in a project finance transaction
Reaching execution day in a project finance transaction is an exercise in many things; just one of those being project management. This can span from forming the project company through to working with sponsors, legal advisors, lenders, agency providers, commercial and construction contracts - the list goes on.
A critical role is that of the account bank. This is not just a safe counterparty for the project company, but a key partner in achieving transparency and control for all stakeholders.
The role of account bank is an area where Santander CIB’s deep history in Structured Finance has cross-pollinated expertise and experience. Our Global Transaction Banking division has significant experience in structuring, executing and managing account bank roles across Europe and the Americas.
Below we have laid out the biggest considerations when weighing up account bank providers, to ensure a smooth close and stable project life.
1. Minimal execution risk
Given the number of stakeholders involved in even a simple project finance structure, a small delay to financial close can have significant knock-on effects. One of the most common sources is the KYC process, which can be time-consuming in a time-sensitive situation.
Sponsors should look for:
- Willingness to share indicative lists of requirements at an early stage of the process to allow pre-work to begin ASAP
- A single points of contact who will manage requirements and responses
- Banks with which they have an existing wider relationship to maximise existing knowledge
A bank which efficiently manages this workstream ensures no impact to the necessary time frames, as well as reducing resource requirements from the sponsor and project company.
2. Speed and pragmatism
Given that sponsors are typically at the centre of a web of many stakeholders, the account bank agreement (ABA) touches many, if not all, of these.
As such, drafting and negotiating the ABA and any cascaded documentation, such as pledges, security documents or electronic banking agreements must be done with this in mind.
When deciding on an account bank provider sponsors should seek the following:
- Banks with experienced and dedicated Global Transaction Banking legal teams, who have experience of working closely with their Structured Finance colleagues
- Partners which show flexibility in aligning document language with market practice, sponsor requirements and the nature of the project
A bank with a strong track record of pragmatism will ensure that all parties are comfortable and controlled. In addition, agreements can then be considered as a precedent for future replicable transactions between the same sponsor and bank, further enhancing speed.
3. Practically workable structures
Generally, account structures are conceived in a purely theoretical way, without thought for the operational impact of these after signing or during the life of the underlying project/asset.
While the agreements may be executed and funded on time, there can be later downstream issues if the bank account setup or ABA are overly complex, inflexible, or misaligned with the project’s real-world needs.
Key questions which you may consider at the outset:
- Can the bank reasonably implement the waterfall as described and defined?
- Can account and electronic banking setups evolve with the project as it grows?
- How can we check and evidence internal controls throughout the life of the ABA?
As project sponsor it is important to work with account bank partners who will quickly and concisely provide feedback on these practicalities. Sponsors should favour banks that not only agree to terms on paper, but that also align their internal operations, systems, and service model to the agreed structure.
4. Long-term projects and long-term relationships
By its very nature, project finance is a long-term transaction, so a reliable, responsive partner is key to ensuring that the project company can meet their ongoing reporting requirements in an efficient way. This can include adapting to changes to payment systems as standards evolve, or finding an efficient way to reuse the existing setup at refinancing.
Ask yourself if your banking partner is likely to be the best bank now given that they are technically capable, but will they also be relationship oriented in five or more years’ time?
Sponsors should assess:
• The account bank’s experience with similar projects and countries
• The level of ongoing support offered post-close, including responsiveness to change requests and day-to-day queries
What may seem like a small administrative role at financial close can become pivotal in moments of change or transition. Sponsors benefit from account banks that take a long-term view and understand the broader dynamics at play of relationships than span the entire organisation.
Weighing up and choosing your partner
The choice of account bank is a strategic, long-term selection for sponsors and other stakeholders.
This provider will bring together all if its stakeholders for the benefit of the project company: compliance, operations, legal, product development and relationship management.
Your ideal partner is one like Santander CIB, a partner experienced in the complexity of project finance and account bank structures, who will bring urgency, flexibility and feedback to the table.
At Santander CIB, we combine technical expertise with a white-glove approach to serving our clients, so that sponsors can focus on delivering successful project outcomes, with minimal risk.
Carlos Gutierrez, Global Transaction Banking - Head of Cash & Lending Sales Europe Santander CIB: “We are fully committed in supporting our clients’ Cash Management journey to successfully execute a spin-off, acquisition, or merger. As a leading pan-European and pan-American Cash Management, liquidity and FX Bank, our expertise is there to help our clients succeed.”
Our Global Transaction Banking and Structured Finance colleagues are always open to engage on ideas in supporting your ABA needs today and in the future.